« Meurtre (infraction) » : différence entre les versions
m Remplacement de texte : « \{\{En\|([^\}\}]+)\}\} » par « en:$1 » Balises : Modification par mobile Modification par le web mobile |
m Remplacement de texte : « |Act={{OBCCC}} » par « |Acte={{OBCCC}} » |
||
Ligne 7 : | Ligne 7 : | ||
|OffencePage=Murder | |OffencePage=Murder | ||
|Section=235 | |Section=235 | ||
| | |Acte={{OBCCC}} | ||
|CrownElection={{OBIndictableElection}} | |CrownElection={{OBIndictableElection}} | ||
|Jurisdiction={{OBJurisdictionExclusive}} | |Jurisdiction={{OBJurisdictionExclusive}} |
Version du 15 juillet 2024 à 21:42
Cette page a été mise à jour ou révisée de manière substantielle pour la dernière fois January 2020. (Rev. # 11823) |
n.b.: Cette page est expérimentale. Si vous repérez une grammaire ou un texte anglais clairement incorrect, veuillez m'en informer à [email protected] et je le corrigerai dès que possible. |
- < Droit pénal
- < Infractions
- < Homicide
Murder | |
---|---|
Art. 235 du Code criminel | |
élection / plaidoyer | |
choix du mode de poursuite | acte d’accusation |
Jurisdiction | Sup. Court w/ Jury (*) Sup. Court w/ Judge-alone (*) |
disposition des actes d'accusation | |
dispositions disponible |
|
minimum | life incarcération |
maximum | Vie |
Référence | |
Éléments d'infraction résumé des cas de la peine |
Aperçu
Les infractions relatives à murder se retrouvent dans la partie VIII du Code Criminel concernant les « Atteintes contre la personne et la réputation ».
- Plaidoiries
Article d'infraction |
Type d'infractions |
Choix du mode de poursuite |
Élection de la défense l'art. 536(2) |
Enquête préliminaire |
---|---|---|---|---|
art. 235 [meurtre au premier ou au deuxième degré] | Infraction(s) criminelle(s) | (durée de vie maximale) |
Les infractions visées à l'article art. 235 [meurtre au premier ou au deuxième degré] sont des infractions de compétence exclusive en vertu de l'article 469 et ne peuvent donc pas être jugées par un juge de la cour provinciale. Elles sont présumées être jugées par un juge et un jury.
Avant que la Couronne puisse invoquer les dispositions augmentant la durée de l'ordonnance d'interdiction d'armes en raison d'une ordonnance d'interdiction d'armes antérieure, un avis en vertu de l'article 727 doit être donné "avant" le plaidoyer.
- LibérerWhere an accused is charged with any offence listed in s. 469 [including 235], he will be remanded under s. 515(11). The accused may only be released by a superior court judge under s. 522.
- Interdictions de publication
Pour toutes les poursuites pénales ou réglementaires, il existe une interdiction générale discrétionnaire de publication, à la demande de la Couronne, de la victime ou du témoin, afin d'interdire la publication de "toute information susceptible d'identifier la victime ou le témoin" en vertu de l'article 486.5(1), lorsque cela est "nécessaire" à la "bonne administration de la justice". D'autres interdictions de publication sont possibles, notamment l'interdiction de publier des preuves ou d'autres informations résultant d'une audience de mise en liberté sous caution (article 517), d'une enquête préliminaire (article 539) ou d'un procès avec jury (article 648). Dans toutes les poursuites intentées contre des adolescents, il existe une interdiction obligatoire de publier les renseignements qui tendent à identifier les jeunes accusés en vertu de l'article 110 de la LSJPA ou les jeunes victimes en vertu de l'article 111 de la LSJPA.
- Désignations d'infraction
Infraction(s) | Admissible à l'écoute électronique l'art. 183 |
Infraction désignée comme délinquant dangereux l'art. 752 |
Sévices graves à la personne l'art. 752 |
Consentement du procureur général requis |
Infraction criminelle grave l'art. 36 LIPR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
art. 235 [meurtre au premier ou au deuxième degré] | (primary) |
Les infractions en vertu de l'art. art. 235 sont infractions désignées admissibles à l'écoute électronique en vertu de l'art. 183.
Voir ci-dessous Ordres de condamnation annexes pour plus de détails sur les désignations relatives aux ordres de condamnation.
Libellé de l'infraction
- Murder, Manslaughter and Infanticide
- Murder
229 Culpable homicide is murder
- (a) where the person who causes the death of a human being
- (i) means to cause his death, or
- (ii) means to cause him bodily harm that he knows is likely to cause his death, and is reckless whether death ensues or not;
- (b) where a person, meaning to cause death to a human being or meaning to cause him bodily harm that he knows is likely to cause his death, and being reckless whether death ensues or not, by accident or mistake causes death to another human being, notwithstanding that he does not mean to cause death or bodily harm to that human being; or
- (c) if a person, for an unlawful object, does anything that they know is likely to cause death, and by doing so causes the death of a human being, even if they desire to effect their object without causing death or bodily harm to any human being.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 229; 2019, c. 25, s. 77.
[annotation(s) ajoutée(s)]
- Classification of murder
231 (1) Murder is first degree murder or second degree murder.
- Planned and deliberate murder
(2) Murder is first degree murder when it is planned and deliberate.
[omis (3), (4), (5), (6), (6.01), (6.1) and (6.2)]
- Second degree murder
(7) All murder that is not first degree murder is second degree murder.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 231; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), ss. 7, 35, 40, 185(F), c. 1 (4th Supp.), s. 18(F); 1997, c. 16, s. 3, c. 23, s. 8; 2001, c. 32, s. 9, c. 41, s. 9; 2009, c. 22, s. 5.
- Punishment for murder
235 (1) Every one who commits first degree murder or second degree murder is guilty of an indictable offence and shall be sentenced to imprisonment for life.
- Minimum punishment
(2) For the purposes of Part XXIII [Pt. XXIII – Détermination de la peine (art. 716 à 751.1)], the sentence of imprisonment for life prescribed by this section is a minimum punishment.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 218; 1973-74, c. 38, s. 3; 1974-75-76, c. 105, s. 5.
- Imprisonment for Life
- Sentence of life imprisonment
745 Subject to section 745.1 [condamnation pour meurtre – moins de 18 ans – instruction], the sentence to be pronounced against a person who is to be sentenced to imprisonment for life shall be
- (a) in respect of a person who has been convicted of high treason or first degree murder, that the person be sentenced to imprisonment for life without eligibility for parole until the person has served twenty-five years of the sentence;
- (b) in respect of a person who has been convicted of second degree murder where that person has previously been convicted of culpable homicide that is murder, however described in this Act, that that person be sentenced to imprisonment for life without eligibility for parole until the person has served twenty-five years of the sentence;
- (b.1) in respect of a person who has been convicted of second degree murder where that person has previously been convicted of an offence under section 4 or 6 of the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act that had as its basis an intentional killing, whether or not it was planned and deliberate, that that person be sentenced to imprisonment for life without eligibility for parole until the person has served twenty-five years of the sentence;
- (c) in respect of a person who has been convicted of second degree murder, that the person be sentenced to imprisonment for life without eligibility for parole until the person has served at least ten years of the sentence or such greater number of years, not being more than twenty-five years, as has been substituted therefor pursuant to section 745.4; and
- [omis (d)]
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 745; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (2nd Supp.), s. 10; 1990, c. 17, s. 14; 1992, c. 51, s. 39; 1995, c. 22, s. 6; 2000, c. 24, s. 46.
Draft Form of Charges
Préambules | ||
---|---|---|
"QUE [nom complet de l'accusé] est accusé d'avoir, entre le <DATE> jour de <MOIS>, <ANNÉE> et le <DATE> jour de <MOIS>, <ANNÉE>***, à ou près de <COMMUNAUTÉ/VILLE/VILLE>, <PROVINCE>, ... " OU | ||
« QUE [nom complet de l'accusé] est accusé d'avoir, le ou vers le <DATE> jour de <MOIS>, <ANNÉE>, à ou près de <COMMUNAUTÉ/VILLE/VILLE>, <PROVINCE>, ... » OU | ||
"ET DE PLUS, au même moment et au même endroit précités, il [ou elle]..." | ||
Article du Code | Objet de l'infraction | Projet de libellé |
235 | first degree murder | "..., did cause the death of [person] and thereby commit murder in the first degree, à savoir : [comportement], contrairement à l'art. 235 du « Code criminel ». |
235 | second degree murder | "..., did cause the death of [person] and thereby commit murder in the second degree, à savoir : [comportement], contrairement à l'art. 235 du « Code criminel ». |
Preuve de l'infraction
Prouver murder selon l'art. 229(a) doit inclure :
|
Prouver transferred intent murder selon l'art. 229(b) doit inclure :
|
Prouver unlawful act murder selon l'art. 229(c) doit inclure :[2]
|
First Degree Murder
Proof of the element of "planned and deliberate", or any of the specific elements of 231(3),(4),(5),(6.01),(6.1), and (6.2), are necessary to make out first degree murder. Without this element, second degree murder is made out.
Section 582 requires the indictment specially indications the charge of first degree murder before there can be a conviction for first degree murder.
- ↑ R c Paskimin, 2012 SKCA 35 (CanLII), 393 Sask R 30, par Herauf JA, au para 33
- ↑ see R c Roks, 2011 ONCA 618 (CanLII), 284 CCC (3d) 510, par Watt JA
Constitutionality
The portion of s. 229(c) that states "ought to know" is unconstitutional and is of no force or effect to the provision.[1]
Section 230 was found unconstitutional because first degree murder cannot be less than objective foresight of death.[2]
- ↑
R c Martineau, 1990 CanLII 80 (SCC), [1990] 2 SCR 633, par Lamer CJ -- found s.230 (constructive murder) unconstitutional
R c Sit, 1991 CanLII 34 (SCC), [1991] 3 SCR 124, par Lamer CJ - ↑
R c Vaillancourt, 1987 CanLII 2 (SCC), [1987] 2 SCR 636, par Lamer J
Martineau, supra -- found s.230 (constructive murder) unconstitutional
Murder
First degree and second degree murder are not separate offences. Section 231, defining first degree murder, is "purely a classification section and does not create a separate substantive offence." The distinction is only for the purpose of sentencing.[1] First degree murder is an "aggravated form of murder and not a distinct substantive offence."[2]
The offence of murder under s. 235 is an exclusive jurisdiction offence, and so cannot be tried before a provincial court judge.[3]
- ↑ R c Nygaard, 1989 CanLII 6 (SCC), [1989] 2 SCR 1074, par Cory J, au para 17
- ↑
R c Harbottle, 1993 CanLII 71 (SCC), [1993] 3 SCR 306, par Cory J at 323
- ↑ see s. 469 and Election
Causation
Intent
Both types of murder require one of three categories of requisite intent set out in s.229:
- the culprit causes death and "means to cause death"; (s. 229(a)(i))
- the culprit causes death and "means to cause him bodily harm that he knows is likely to cause his death, and is reckless whether death ensues or not". (s. 229(a)(ii))
- the culprit causes death but does so by accident or mistake, while at some point during the act forms a meaning set out above in 229(a)(i) or 229(a)(ii). (s.229(b))
- causes death while pursuing an "unlawful object" that "he knows or ought to know is likely to cause death". (s.229(c))
The necessary intent for murder requires proving a subjective foresight of death.[1]
The requisite intent does not need to be simultaneous to the act that causes death. The two must coincide with the "transaction" that forms the substance of the killing. The intent does not need to be present throughout the acts or series of actions or events. [2]
An accused may still be convicted if he does not know the victim's identity[3] or is mistaken as to the victim's identity.[4]
- Foreseeable Death (s. 229(a)(ii))
The Crown must prove that the accused had actual subjective forsight of the victim's death as a "probable consequence" of the assault.[5]
The phrase "is reckless whether death ensues or not" has been characterized as "largely redundant."[6]
- Section 229(b)
Section 229(b) has the same requirements as s. 229(a) except that it applies where the conduct and intent was directed at a third party and the victim was killed by accident or mistake. This effectively creates a form of transferred intent for murder.
- ↑ R c Vaillancourt, 1987 CanLII 2 (SCC), [1987] 2 SCR 636, par Lamer J
- ↑ R c Cooper, 1993 CanLII 147 (SCC), [1993] 1 SCR 146, par Cory J
- ↑ R c Marshall, 1986 CanLII 4617 (NSCA), 25 CCC (3d) 151, par Clarke JA
- ↑ R c Prevost, 1988 CanLII 7058 (ON CA), 42 CCC (3d) 314, par Zuber JA
- ↑
R c Rodgerson, 2014 ONCA 366 (CanLII), 309 CCC (3d) 535, par Doherty JA, au para 24 ("The impugned instruction was given in the course of the trial judge’s description of the elements of self-defence, although a similar brief passage also appears in his instructions on intoxication. However, in the part of the instruction dealing specifically with the state of mind required for murder, the trial judge on at least three occasions correctly set out the foreseeability requirement in s. 229(a)(ii), telling the jury that the Crown had to prove that the appellant foresaw Ms. Young’s death as the probable consequence of his assault on her.")
Vaillantcourt, supra, au para 11 ("Here again the accused must have actual subjective foresight of the likelihood of death. However, the Crown need no longer prove that he intended to cause the death but only that he was reckless whether death ensued or not. It should also be noted that s. 212(a)(ii) is limited to cases where the accused intended to cause bodily harm to the victim.") - ↑
, ibid., au para 23
Planned and Deliberate (s. 231(2))
Murder by Unlawful Act or Object (s. 229(c) and 231(3) to (6))
Lesser Included Offences
662
[omis (1)]
- First degree murder charged
(2) For greater certainty and without limiting the generality of subsection (1) [infraction imputée, prouvée en partie seulement], where a count charges first degree murder and the evidence does not prove first degree murder but proves second degree murder or an attempt to commit second degree murder, the jury may find the accused not guilty of first degree murder but guilty of second degree murder or an attempt to commit second degree murder, as the case may be.
- Conviction for infanticide or manslaughter on charge of murder
(3) Subject to subsection (4) [condamnation pour dissimulation du corps d'un enfant en cas d'accusation de meurtre ou d'infanticide], where a count charges murder and the evidence proves manslaughter or infanticide but does not prove murder, the jury may find the accused not guilty of murder but guilty of manslaughter or infanticide, but shall not on that count find the accused guilty of any other offence.
[omis (4), (5) and (6)]
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 662; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 134; 2000, c. 2, s. 3; 2008, c. 6, s. 38; 2018, c. 21, s. 20.
[annotation(s) ajoutée(s)]
Where the Crown proves an intent to kill but fails to prove causation, the lesser included offence of attempted murder is available.[1]
- ↑ R c Sarrazin, 2010 ONCA 577 (CanLII), 259 CCC (3d) 293, par Doherty JA
Res Judicata
- Circumstances of aggravation
610
[omis (1)]
- Effect of previous charge of murder or manslaughter
(2) A conviction or an acquittal on an indictment for murder bars a subsequent indictment for the same homicide charging it as manslaughter or infanticide, and a conviction or acquittal on an indictment for manslaughter or infanticide bars a subsequent indictment for the same homicide charging it as murder.
- Previous charges of first degree murder
(3) A conviction or an acquittal on an indictment for first degree murder bars a subsequent indictment for the same homicide charging it as second degree murder, and a conviction or acquittal on an indictment for second degree murder bars a subsequent indictment for the same homicide charging it as first degree murder.
[omis (4)]
R.S., c. C-34, s. 538; 1973-74, c. 38, s. 5; 1974-75-76, c. 105, s. 9.
Manslaughter
Proof of Death
Death occurs once the vital functions and organs irreversibly cease to operate.[1]
The Crown must prove as an essential element that the victim is dead. In most cases this is a trivial fact. It is only in murder cases with a missing body that there may be an issue in proving the element.[2]
There is no rule requiring that body be found in order to prove a homicide.[3]
- ↑ R c Green, 1988 CanLII 3274 (BC SC), 43 CCC (3d) 413, par Wood J
- ↑
e.g. R c Pritchard, 2007 BCCA 82 (CanLII), 217 CCC (3d) 1, par Hall JA, aff'd at SCC in 236 CCC (3d) 301, 2008 SCC 59 (CanLII), [2008] 3 SCR 195, par Binnie J -- conviction for first degree with no evidence of body or how the victim died
R c St-Germain, 2009 QCCA 1474 (CanLII), par Dufresne JA - ↑ R c CMM, 2012 MBQB 141 (CanLII), 93 CR (6th) 155, par Joyal CJ ("For example, the absence of a body in a murder prosecution will not preclude a conviction where the other direct and/or circumstantial evidence establishes that an unlawful death has occurred involving an identifiable victim. ")
Special Procedure
- High treason and first degree murder
582 No person shall be convicted for the offence of high treason or first degree murder unless in the indictment charging the offence he is specifically charged with that offence.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 511; 1973-74, c. 38, s. 4; 1974-75-76, c. 105, s. 6.
- Joinder or Severance of Counts
- Count for murder
589 No count that charges an indictable offence other than murder shall be joined in an indictment to a count that charges murder unless
- (a) the count that charges the offence other than murder arises out of the same transaction as a count that charges murder; or
- (b) the accused signifies consent to the joinder of the counts.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 589; 1991, c. 4, s. 2.
Defences
The statutory defence of duress is excluded by s. 17 from applying to offences of murder.
The argument of excessive use of force in self-defence does not reduce murder to manslaughter.[1]
- ↑
R c Reilly, 1984 CanLII 83 (SCC), [1984] 2 SCR 396, par Ritchie J
see also Self-Defence and Defence of Another
Participation de tiers
- Aides au témoignage
Certaines personnes qui témoignent ont le droit de demander l'utilisation d'aides au témoignage: Exclusion of Public (l'art. 486), Utilisation d'un écran de témoignage (l'art. 486), Accès à une personne de soutien pendant le témoignage (l'art. 486.1), Témoignage par lien vidéo à proximité (l'art. 486.2), Ordonnance d’interdiction de contre-interrogatoire par autoreprésentation (l'art. 486.3), et Ordonnance de sécurité des témoins (l'art. 486.7).
Un témoin, une victime ou un plaignant peut également demander une interdiction de publication (art. 486.4, 486.5) et/ou une ordonnance de non-divulgation de l'identité du témoin (art. 486.31). Voir également Interdictions de publication, ci-dessus ici.
- Sur le constat de culpabilité
Article(s) | Avis d'entente à la victime l'art. 606(4.1) [SPIO] |
La victime est interrogée sur son intérêt pour l'accord l'art. 606(4.2) [5+ ans] |
Avis d'entente à la dédommagement l'art. 737.1 |
Avis de déclaration d'impact à la victime l'art. 722(2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
art. 235 [meurtre au premier ou au deuxième degré] |
Sous l'art. 738, un juge doit demander au ministère public avant de prononcer la peine si « des mesures raisonnables ont été prises pour donner aux victimes la possibilité d'indiquer si elles demandent restitution pour leurs pertes et dommages ».
Sous l'art. 722(2), le juge doit demander « dès que possible » avant de prononcer la peine auprès de la Couronne « si des mesures raisonnables ont été prises pour donner à la victime la possibilité de préparer » une déclaration de la victime . Cela comprendra toute personne « qui a subi, ou est soupçonnée d'avoir subi, un préjudice physique ou émotionnel, un dommage matériel ou une perte économique » à la suite de l'infraction. Les individus représentant une communauté touchée par le crime peuvent déposer une déclaration en vertu de l'art. 722.2.
Principes et fourchettes de détermination des peines
Historique
2001 to 2009
- Classification of murder
231 (1) Murder is first degree murder or second degree murder.
- Planned and deliberate murder
(2) Murder is first degree murder when it is planned and deliberate.
- Contracted murder
(3) Without limiting the generality of subsection (2), murder is planned and deliberate when it is committed pursuant to an arrangement under which money or anything of value passes or is intended to pass from one person to another, or is promised by one person to another, as consideration for that other’s causing or assisting in causing the death of anyone or counselling another person to do any act causing or assisting in causing that death.
- Murder of peace officer, etc.
(4) Irrespective of whether a murder is planned and deliberate on the part of any person, murder is first degree murder when the victim is
- (a) a police officer, police constable, constable, sheriff, deputy sheriff, sheriff’s officer or other person employed for the preservation and maintenance of the public peace, acting in the course of his duties;
- (b) a warden, deputy warden, instructor, keeper, jailer, guard or other officer or a permanent employee of a prison, acting in the course of his duties; or
- (c) a person working in a prison with the permission of the prison authorities and acting in the course of his work therein.
- Hijacking, sexual assault or kidnapping
(5) Irrespective of whether a murder is planned and deliberate on the part of any person, murder is first degree murder in respect of a person when the death is caused by that person while committing or attempting to commit an offence under one of the following sections:
- (a) section 76 (hijacking an aircraft);
- (b) section 271 (sexual assault);
- (c) section 272 (sexual assault with a weapon, threats to a third party or causing bodily harm);
- (d) section 273 (aggravated sexual assault);
- (e) section 279 (kidnapping and forcible confinement); or
- (f) section 279.1 (hostage taking).
- Criminal harassment
(6) Irrespective of whether a murder is planned and deliberate on the part of any person, murder is first degree murder when the death is caused by that person while committing or attempting to commit an offence under section 264 and the person committing that offence intended to cause the person murdered to fear for the safety of the person murdered or the safety of anyone known to the person murdered.
- Murder during terrorist activity
(6.01) Irrespective of whether a murder is planned and deliberate on the part of a person, murder is first degree murder when the death is caused while committing or attempting to commit an indictable offence under this or any other Act of Parliament where the act or omission constituting the offence also constitutes a terrorist activity.
- Using explosives in association with criminal organization
(6.1) Irrespective of whether a murder is planned and deliberate on the part of a person, murder is first degree murder when the death is caused while committing or attempting to commit an offence under section 81 for the benefit of, at the direction of or in association with a criminal organization.
- Intimidation
(6.2) Irrespective of whether a murder is planned and deliberate on the part of a person, murder is first degree murder when the death is caused while committing or attempting to commit an offence under section 423.1.
- Second degree murder
(7) All murder that is not first degree murder is second degree murder.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 231; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), ss. 7, 35, 40, 185(F), c. 1 (4th Supp.), s. 18(F); 1997, c. 16, s. 3, c. 23, s. 8; 2001, c. 32, s. 9, c. 41, s. 9.– CCC
Voir également
- References
|
- 2020
- Categories
- Droit pénal
- Infractions
- Infractions de compétence exclusive
- Infractions éligibles à l'écoute électronique
- 1985, c. C-46
- 2019, c. 25
- 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.)
- 1997, c. 16
- 2001, c. 32
- 2009, c. 22
- 1985, c. 27 (2nd Supp.)
- 1990, c. 17
- 1992, c. 51
- 1995, c. 22
- 2000, c. 24
- 2000, c. 2
- 2008, c. 6
- 2018, c. 21
- Infractions nécessitant un avis à la victime
- Homicide infractions
- Unconstitutional Offences