Mandats d'arrêt pour défaut de comparution au tribunal

Ang

Fr

Cette page a été mise à jour ou révisée de manière substantielle pour la dernière fois August 2021. (Rev. # 6518)

n.b.: Cette page est expérimentale. Si vous repérez une grammaire ou un texte anglais clairement incorrect, veuillez m'en informer à [email protected] et je le corrigerai dès que possible.

• < Procédure et pratique
• < Arrestation et détention

Principes généraux

Under s. 511, the execution of a warrant or arrest authorizes 1) the arrest of the accused and 2) the officer to bring the accused before a judge in the territorial division in which the warrant was issued.

A provincial court judge upon issuing an arrest warrant cannot require that the accused only be brought the issuer of the warrant.

Warrant for Failing to Attend Under Summons or Appearance Notice

512
[omis (1)]
Mandat à défaut de comparution

(2) Un juge de paix peut décerner un mandat pour l’arrestation du prévenu dans l’un ou l’autre des cas suivants :

a) la signification d’une sommation est prouvée et le prévenu omet d’être présent au tribunal en conformité avec la sommation;

b) une citation à comparaître ou une promesse ont été confirmées en vertu du paragraphe 508(1) [obligation de justice à la réception d'une information], et le prévenu omet d’être présent au tribunal en conformité avec la citation ou la promesse pour être traité selon la loi;

c) il paraît qu’une sommation ne peut être signifiée parce que le prévenu se soustrait à la signification.

L.R. (1985), ch. C-46, art. 512; L.R. (1985), ch. 27 (1er suppl.), art. 82 1997, ch. 18, art. 58 2019, ch. 25, art. 223
[annotation(s) ajoutée(s)]

– CCC (CanLII), (Jus.)

---

Mandat pour omission de comparaître — sommation

512.1 Lorsque le prévenu à qui une sommation enjoint de comparaître aux date, heure et lieu indiqués pour l’application de la Loi sur l’identification des criminels ne comparaît pas aux date, heure et lieu ainsi indiqués et, dans le cas d’une infraction qualifiée de contravention en vertu de la Loi sur les contraventions, si le procureur général, au sens de cette loi, ne se prévaut pas du choix prévu à l’article 50 de la même loi, tout juge de paix peut décerner un mandat pour l’arrestation du prévenu pour l’infraction dont il est inculpé.

2019, ch. 25, art. 224.

– CCC (CanLII), (Jus.)

---

Mandat pour omission de comparaître — citation à comparaître ou promesse

512.2 Lorsque le prévenu à qui une citation à comparaître ou une promesse enjoint de comparaître aux date, heure et lieu indiqués, pour l’application de la Loi sur l’identification des criminels, ne comparaît pas aux date, heure et lieu ainsi indiqués, tout juge de paix peut, lorsque la citation à comparaître ou la promesse a été confirmée par un juge de paix en vertu de l’article 508 [justice to hear informant and witness], décerner un mandat pour l’arrestation du prévenu pour l’infraction dont il est inculpé.

2019, ch. 25, art. 224. 
[annotation(s) ajoutée(s)]

– CCC (CanLII), (Jus.)

---

Warrant to appear under section 524

512.3 If a justice is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that an accused has contravened or is about to contravene any summons, appearance notice, undertaking or release order that was issued or given to the accused or entered into by the accused or has committed an indictable offence while being subject to any summons, appearance notice, undertaking or release order, the justice may issue a warrant for the purpose of taking them before a justice under section 524 [procédure relative à la violation des conditions].

2019, c. 25, s. 224.
[annotation(s) ajoutée(s)]

– CCC (CanLII), (Jus.)

---

Bench Warrant for Failing to Attend Trial at Superior Court

The judge ordering an arrest under s. 475 (absconding during trial), Part XVI (compelling attendance), 597 (bench warrant), 800 (summary trial) or 803 (summary appearance) can issue a warrant using "Form 7", which is the standard arrest warrant.

Bench warrant

597 (1) Where an indictment has been preferred against a person who is at large, and that person does not appear or remain in attendance for his trial, the court before which the accused should have appeared or remained in attendance may issue a warrant in Form 7 [formes] for his arrest.

Execution

(2) A warrant issued under subsection (1) [mandat d'arrêt pour défaut de comparution pour mise en accusation] may be executed anywhere in Canada.

Interim release

(3) If an accused is arrested under a warrant issued under subsection (1) [mandat d'arrêt pour défaut de comparution pour mise en accusation], a judge of the court that issued the warrant may make a release order referred to in section 515 [dispositions relatives à la mise en liberté provisoire par voie judiciaire].

Discretion to postpone execution

(4) A judge who issues a warrant may specify in the warrant the period before which the warrant shall not be executed, to allow the accused to appear voluntarily before a judge having jurisdiction in the territorial division in which the warrant was issued.

Deemed execution of warrant

(5) Where the accused appears voluntarily for the offence in respect of which the accused is charged, the warrant is deemed to be executed.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 597; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 121; 1997, c. 18, s. 68; 2019, c. 25, s. 266.
[annotation(s) ajoutée(s)]

– CCC (CanLII), (Jus.)

---

Bench Warrant for Failing to Attend Trial for Summary Offence

s. 800
[omis (1)]

Counsel or agent

(2) A defendant may appear personally or by counsel or agent, but the summary conviction court may require the defendant to appear personally and may, if it thinks fit, issue a warrant in Form 7 [formes] for the arrest of the defendant and adjourn the trial to await his appearance pursuant thereto. [omis (2.1) and (3)]
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 800; 1997, c. 18, s. 111; 2003, c. 21, s. 21; 2019, c. 25, s. 317; 2022, c. 17, s. 53.
[annotation(s) ajoutée(s)]

– CCC (CanLII), (Jus.)

---

Summary Conviction Trial

803
[omis (1)]

Non-appearance of defendant

(2) If a defendant who is tried alone or together with others does not appear at the time and place appointed for the trial after having been notified of that time and place, or does not appear for the resumption of a trial that has been adjourned in accordance with subsection (1) [summary offences – right to adjourn matters], the summary conviction court

(a) may proceed ex parte to hear and determine the proceedings in the absence of that defendant as if they had appeared; or

(b) may, if it thinks fit, issue a warrant in Form 7 [formes] for the arrest of that defendant and adjourn the trial to await their appearance under the warrant.

[omis (3) and (4)]
(5) to (8) [Repealed, 1991, c. 43, s. 9]
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 803; 1991, c. 43, s. 9; 1994, c. 44, s. 79; 1997, c. 18, s. 112; 2008, c. 18, s. 45.

– CCC (CanLII), (Jus.)

---

Effect of Failure to Attend on Jurisdiction

Procedural irregularities

485
[omis (1)]

When accused not appearing personally or in person

(1.1) Jurisdiction over an accused is not lost by reason of the failure of the accused to appear personally or in person, so long as the provisions of this Act or a rule made under section 482 [pouvoirs de la cour supérieure et de la cour d'appel pour établir des règles] or 482.1 [pouvoirs de la cour supérieure et de la cour d'appel pour établir des règles de gestion des affaires] permitting the accused not to appear personally or in person apply.

Summons or warrant

(2) Where jurisdiction over an accused or a defendant is lost and has not been regained, a court, judge, provincial court judge or justice may, within three months after the loss of jurisdiction, issue a summons, or if it or he considers it necessary in the public interest, a warrant for the arrest of the accused or defendant.

Dismissal for want of prosecution

(3) Where no summons or warrant is issued under subsection (2) [irrégularités de procédure dans une assignation ou un mandat] within the period provided therein, the proceedings shall be deemed to be dismissed for want of prosecution and shall not be recommenced except in accordance with section 485.1 [recommencement des accusations rejetées].

Adjournment and order

(4) Where, in the opinion of the court, judge, provincial court judge or justice, an accused or a defendant who appears at a proceeding has been misled or prejudiced by reason of any matter referred to in subsection (1) [irrégularités de procédure], the court, judge, provincial court judge or justice may adjourn the proceeding and may make such order as it or he considers appropriate.

Part XVI to apply

(5) The provisions of Part XVI [Pt. XVI – Mesures concernant la comparution d’un prévenu devant un juge de paix et la mise en liberté provisoire (art. 493 à 529.5)] apply with such modifications as the circumstances require where a summons or warrant is issued under subsection (2) [irrégularités de procédure dans une assignation ou un mandat].

R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 485 R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 67; 1992, c. 1, s. 60(F); 1997, c. 18, s. 40; 2002, c. 13, s. 19; 2019, c. 25, s. 188; 2022, c. 17, s. 14.
[annotation(s) ajoutée(s)]

– CCC (CanLII), (Jus.)

---

Loss of Jurisdiction

It is said that when an adjournment or remand date is passed without the court addressing the matter, the provincial court loses jurisdiction over the offence. It also loses jurisdiction over the information.

Where jurisdiction is lost, the crown may apply for a order of mandamus to issue a summons or warrant to compel attendance anew. The accused may apply for an order of prohibition to stop the provincial court from re-initiating jurisdiction.

It is suggested that the 1985 amendments to what was s. 440.1 expands the scope of jurisdiction and meritme

Effect of Bench Warrant on Mode of Trial

Election deemed to be waived

598 (1) Notwithstanding anything in this Act, where a person to whom subsection 597(1) [mandat d'arrêt pour défaut de comparution pour mise en accusation] applies has elected or is deemed to have elected to be tried by a court composed of a judge and jury and, at the time he failed to appear or to remain in attendance for his trial, he had not re-elected to be tried by a court composed of a judge without a jury or a provincial court judge without a jury, he shall not be tried by a court composed of a judge and jury unless

(a) he establishes to the satisfaction of a judge of the court in which he is indicted that there was a legitimate excuse for his failure to appear or remain in attendance for his trial; or

(b) the Attorney General requires pursuant to section 568 [Dérogation du procureur général] or 569 [Le procureur général peut exiger un procès avec jury — Nunavut] that the accused be tried by a court composed of a judge and jury.

Election deemed to be waived

(2) An accused who, under subsection (1) [réélection réputée pour être juge seul en cas de défaut de comparution au procès], may not be tried by a court composed of a judge and jury is deemed to have elected under section 536 [ procès des infractions de compétence absolue] or 536.1 [procès pour infractions de compétence absolue – Nunavut] to be tried without a jury by a judge of the court where the accused was indicted and section 561 [droit de réélection] or 561.1 [droit de réélection - Nunavut], as the case may be, does not apply in respect of the accused.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 598; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), ss. 122, 185(F), 203(E); 1999, c. 3, s. 51; 2002, c. 13, s. 48(E).
[annotation(s) ajoutée(s)]

– CCC (CanLII), (Jus.)

---

While s. 598 does violate s. 11(f) of the Charter it is saved as a reasonable limitation under s. 1 of the Charter.