« Définition de l'interception des communications privées » : différence entre les versions
Page créée avec « {{HeaderWiretaps}} ==Definitions== ==="Private Communication"=== {{seealso|Reasonable Expectation of Privacy}} Section 183 defines "private communication": {{quotation2| 183 In this Part {{AnnSec|Part VI}},<Br> {{ellipsis}} '''"private communication"''' means any oral communication, or any telecommunication, that is made by an originator who is in Canada or is intended by the originator to be received by a person who is in Canada and that is made under circumstan... » |
Aucun résumé des modifications |
||
Ligne 1 : | Ligne 1 : | ||
[[en:Definition of Interception of Private Communications]] | |||
{{HeaderWiretaps}} | {{HeaderWiretaps}} | ||
==Definitions== | ==Definitions== |
Version du 28 octobre 2024 à 07:47
- < Fouilles, perquisitions et saisies
- < Mandats de perquisition
- < Écoutes téléphoniques
Definitions
"Private Communication"
Section 183 defines "private communication":
183 In this Part [Pt. VI – Atteintes à la vie privée (art. 183 à 196.1)],
...
"private communication" means any oral communication, or any telecommunication, that is made by an originator who is in Canada or is intended by the originator to be received by a person who is in Canada and that is made under circumstances in which it is reasonable for the originator to expect that it will not be intercepted by any person other than the person intended by the originator to receive it, and includes any radio-based telephone communication that is treated electronically or otherwise for the purpose of preventing intelligible reception by any person other than the person intended by the originator to receive it; (communication privée)
...
L.R. (1985), ch. C-46, art. 183; L.R. (1985), ch. 27 (1er suppl.), art. 7 et 23, ch. 1 (2e suppl.), art. 213, ch. 1 (4e suppl.), art. 13, ch. 29 (4e suppl.), art. 17, ch. 42 (4e suppl.), art. 1; 1991, ch. 28, art. 12; 1992, ch. 27, art. 90; 1993, ch. 7, art. 5, ch. 25, art. 94, ch. 40, art. 1, ch. 46, art. 4; 1995, ch. 39, art. 140; 1996, ch. 19, art. 66; 1997, ch. 18, art. 7, ch. 23, art. 3; 1998, ch. 34, art. 8; 1999, ch. 2, art. 47, ch. 5, art. 4; 2000, ch. 24, art. 43; 2001, ch. 32, art. 4, ch. 41, art. 5, 31 et 133; 2002, ch. 22, art. 409; 2004, ch. 15, art. 108; 2005, ch. 32, art. 10, ch. 43, art. 1; 2008, ch. 6, art. 15; 2009, ch. 2, art. 442, ch. 22, art. 4, ch. 28, art. 3; 2010, ch. 3, art. 1, ch. 14, art. 2; 2012, ch. 1, art. 24; 2013, ch. 8, art. 2, ch. 9, art. 14, ch. 13, art. 7; 2014, ch. 17, art. 2, ch. 20, art. 366(E), ch. 25, art. 11, ch. 31, art. 7, ch. 32, art. 59; 2015, ch. 20, art. 19; 2017, ch. 7, art. 56; 2018, ch. 12, art. 114, ch. 16, art. 210, ch. 26, art. 23, ch. 29, art. 15; 2019, ch. 13, art. 150; 2019, ch. 16, art. 122; 2019, ch. 25, art. 63.1; 2020, ch. 1, art. 36; 2021, ch. 24, art. 3; 2021, ch. 27, art. 1; 2022, ch. 10, art. 81; 2022, ch. 17, art. 5; 2023, ch. 14, art. 2; 2023, ch. 32, art. 13.
- "Private"
A communication is private where the originator has a reasonable expectation that the communication would "not be intercepted by any person other than the person intended by the originator to receive it".[1] The intention of who is to receive the communication includes those who the originator had knowledge would receive it but may not desire them to receive it.[2]
Where it is reasonable to expect that the communication may be listened to or recorded, then it is not a private communication.[3]
Communication requires some exchange of information between persons and not simply all information capturable by the interception. [4] Consequently, sounds not intended to convey information does not constitute a communication.[5]
- "Communications"
According to s. 183, a "communication" can be either "oral communication" or "telecommunication".
The following has been found not to be a "private communication":
- Electronic signals captured by a digital number recorder (DNR) [6]
- communication of a paging device.[7]
- a prayer to God as God does not meet the legal definition of a person.[8]
- a cassette sent through the mail[9]
- prayers to God[10]
- "originator"
The "originator" refers to the person whose "remarks which the Crown seeks to adduce in evidence" and are protected under Part VI of the Code.[11]
- ↑
R c Kyling, 2009 QCCS 3311 (CanLII), par Tardif J
- ↑ R c Goldman, 1979 CanLII 60 (SCC), [1980] 1 SCR 976, par Mclntyre J
- ↑
R c Newall, 1982 CanLII 276 (BC SC), 67 CCC (2d) 431, par Bouck J
R c Davie, 1980 CanLII 323 (BC CA), 54 CCC (2d) 216, par Hutcheon J
- ↑ R c Balatoni, 2003 CanLII 13174 (ON SC), par Dawson J, au para 8
- ↑ Balatoni
- ↑
R c Fegan, 1993 CanLII 8607 (ON CA), , 80 CCC (3d) 356, par Finlayson JA
cf. R c Griffith, 1988 CanLII 7059 (ON SC), (1989) 44 CCC (3d) 63, par McDermid J
- ↑
R c Lubovac, 1989 ABCA 320 (CanLII), (1990) 52 CCC (3d) 551, par McClung JA
- ↑ Davie, supra
- ↑ R c Newall, 1982 CanLII 276 (BC SC), 67 CCC (2d) 431, par Bouck J
- ↑ Davie, supra
- ↑ R c Goldman, 1979 CanLII 60 (SCC), [1980] 1 SCR 976, par Mclntyre J
"Telecommunications"
Section 35 of the Interpretation Act defines "telecommunications" as: "means the emission, transmission or reception of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds or intelligence of any nature by any wire, cable, radio, optical or other electromagnetic system, or by any similar technical system"
This definition was found to include technology such as Dialed number recorders.[1]
This term is also used in the offence of Child Luring (Offence), Agree or Arrange a Sexual Offence Against Child (Offence), and Telecommunication Offences (Offence).
- Warrants Apply to Many Types of Communication
- One application for authorization sufficient
184.6 For greater certainty, an application for an authorization under this Part [Pt. VI – Atteintes à la vie privée (art. 183 à 196.1)] may be made with respect to both private communications and radio-based telephone communications at the same time.
1993, c. 40, s. 4.
- ↑
R c Lee, 2007 ABQB 767 (CanLII), 427 AR 76, par Sulyma J
R c Croft, 2013 ABQB 644 (CanLII), par Burrows J, au para 22
"Interception"
"Interception" means to "listen to, record or acquire a communication or acquire the substance, meaning or purport thereof;" (s. 183).[1]
- Identity of Intended Recipient
A communication that is directed to law enforcement under false assumption of identity is not usually an "intercept" where it is not "participant surveillance".
An online undercover police officer who impersonates a young person and communicates with the accused is not intercepting as there is no "surreptitious" recording of the conversation and no "interception" as between the accused and third party.[2]
Telephone communications between the accused and the police who answers the phone at a drug house and assumes the identity of the homeowner are not covered by Part VI.[3]
- "Intercept" vs "Disclose"
The scheme of Part VI distinguishes between "interception" and "use or retention" of that communication, which is conceptually "different and distinct."[4]
- Timing of Capture
There is the suggestion that there does not need to be a direct temporal connection between the message seizure and the transmission of the message.[5]
However, text messages saved within the network of a service provider can be otained by a production order as it is not an "intercept."[6] It will generally be required where the message has not yet come into existence or have not yet been received by the recipient.[7]
- Devices Used to Intercept
The interception must be done by way of an "electromagnetic, acoustic, mechanical or other device" (s.183). Consequently, simply to use one's human senses without technological aids does not invoke Part VI. [8]
- Definitions
183 In this Part,
...
"electro-magnetic, acoustic, mechanical or other device" means any device or apparatus that is used or is capable of being used to intercept a private communication, but does not include a hearing aid used to correct subnormal hearing of the user to not better than normal hearing; (dispositif électromagnétique, acoustique, mécanique ou autre)
...
L.R. (1985), ch. C-46, art. 183; L.R. (1985), ch. 27 (1er suppl.), art. 7 et 23, ch. 1 (2e suppl.), art. 213, ch. 1 (4e suppl.), art. 13, ch. 29 (4e suppl.), art. 17, ch. 42 (4e suppl.), art. 1; 1991, ch. 28, art. 12; 1992, ch. 27, art. 90; 1993, ch. 7, art. 5, ch. 25, art. 94, ch. 40, art. 1, ch. 46, art. 4; 1995, ch. 39, art. 140; 1996, ch. 19, art. 66; 1997, ch. 18, art. 7, ch. 23, art. 3; 1998, ch. 34, art. 8; 1999, ch. 2, art. 47, ch. 5, art. 4; 2000, ch. 24, art. 43; 2001, ch. 32, art. 4, ch. 41, art. 5, 31 et 133; 2002, ch. 22, art. 409; 2004, ch. 15, art. 108; 2005, ch. 32, art. 10, ch. 43, art. 1; 2008, ch. 6, art. 15; 2009, ch. 2, art. 442, ch. 22, art. 4, ch. 28, art. 3; 2010, ch. 3, art. 1, ch. 14, art. 2; 2012, ch. 1, art. 24; 2013, ch. 8, art. 2, ch. 9, art. 14, ch. 13, art. 7; 2014, ch. 17, art. 2, ch. 20, art. 366(E), ch. 25, art. 11, ch. 31, art. 7, ch. 32, art. 59; 2015, ch. 20, art. 19; 2017, ch. 7, art. 56; 2018, ch. 12, art. 114, ch. 16, art. 210, ch. 26, art. 23, ch. 29, art. 15; 2019, ch. 13, art. 150; 2019, ch. 16, art. 122; 2019, ch. 25, art. 63.1; 2020, ch. 1, art. 36; 2021, ch. 24, art. 3; 2021, ch. 27, art. 1; 2022, ch. 10, art. 81; 2022, ch. 17, art. 5; 2023, ch. 14, art. 2; 2023, ch. 32, art. 13.
- ↑ L.R. (1985), ch. C-46, art. 183; L.R. (1985), ch. 27 (1er suppl.), art. 7 et 23, ch. 1 (2e suppl.), art. 213, ch. 1 (4e suppl.), art. 13, ch. 29 (4e suppl.), art. 17, ch. 42 (4e suppl.), art. 1; 1991, ch. 28, art. 12; 1992, ch. 27, art. 90; 1993, ch. 7, art. 5, ch. 25, art. 94, ch. 40, art. 1, ch. 46, art. 4; 1995, ch. 39, art. 140; 1996, ch. 19, art. 66; 1997, ch. 18, art. 7, ch. 23, art. 3; 1998, ch. 34, art. 8; 1999, ch. 2, art. 47, ch. 5, art. 4; 2000, ch. 24, art. 43; 2001, ch. 32, art. 4, ch. 41, art. 5, 31 et 133; 2002, ch. 22, art. 409; 2004, ch. 15, art. 108; 2005, ch. 32, art. 10, ch. 43, art. 1; 2008, ch. 6, art. 15; 2009, ch. 2, art. 442, ch. 22, art. 4, ch. 28, art. 3; 2010, ch. 3, art. 1, ch. 14, art. 2; 2012, ch. 1, art. 24; 2013, ch. 8, art. 2, ch. 9, art. 14, ch. 13, art. 7; 2014, ch. 17, art. 2, ch. 20, art. 366(E), ch. 25, art. 11, ch. 31, art. 7, ch. 32, art. 59; 2015, ch. 20, art. 19; 2017, ch. 7, art. 56; 2018, ch. 12, art. 114, ch. 16, art. 210, ch. 26, art. 23, ch. 29, art. 15; 2019, ch. 13, art. 150; 2019, ch. 16, art. 122; 2019, ch. 25, art. 63.1; 2020, ch. 1, art. 36; 2021, ch. 24, art. 3; 2021, ch. 27, art. 1; 2022, ch. 10, art. 81; 2022, ch. 17, art. 5; 2023, ch. 14, art. 2; 2023, ch. 32, art. 13.
- ↑
R c Mills, 2017 NLCA 12 (CanLII), NJ No 55, par Welsh JA pending appeal at SCC
R c Beairsto, 2018 ABCA 118 (CanLII), 359 CCC (3d) 376, par curiam (3:0) - ↑
R c Singh, 1998 CanLII 4819 (BC CA), 127 CCC (3d) 429, par Hall JA
R c McQueen, 1975 CanLII 1373 (AB CA), (1979) 25 CCC (2d) 262 (SKQB), par McDermid JA (“The [wiretap provisions are] aimed at preventing a third party from intercepting the private communication between two people. It is not intended to apply to the case where there are only two persons involved and one receives a message by impersonation of fraud.”)
see also R c Giles, 2007 BCSC 1147 (CanLII), 77 WCB (2d) 469, par MacKenzie JA, au para 31
- ↑
R c Jones, 2017 SCC 60 (CanLII), [2017] 2 SCR 696, par Cote J, au para 63
- ↑ R c Telus Communications, 2013 SCC 16 (CanLII), [2013] 2 SCR 3 per plurality reasons, au para 35 ("definition of “intercept” that the interception of a private communication be simultaneous or contemporaneous with the making of the communication itself")
- ↑
Jones, supra
R c Belcourt, 2015 BCCA 126 (CanLII), 322 CCC (3d) 93, par Kirkpatrick JA
R c Webster, 2015 BCCA 286 (CanLII), 326 CCC (3d) 228, par Chiasson JA
R c Didechko, 2015 ABQB 642 (CanLII), 27 Alta LR (6th) 290, par Schutz J
cf. R c Hoelscher, 2016 ABQB 44 (CanLII), par Simpson J
R c Croft, 2013 ABQB 640 (CanLII), 304 CCC (3d) 279, par Burrows J
- ↑ , ibid.
- ↑
R c Beckner, 1978 CanLII 2511 (ON CA), 43 CCC (2d) 356, par Dubin JA -- officer overhears a conversation between accused and a friend
R c Kopinsky, 1985 CanLII 1191 (AB QB), 62 AR 100, par McFadyen J
- 1991, ch. 28
- 1992, ch. 27
- 1993, ch. 7
- 1995, ch. 39
- 1996, ch. 19
- 1997, ch. 18
- 1998, ch. 34
- 1999, ch. 2
- 2000, ch. 24
- 2001, ch. 32
- 2002, ch. 22
- 2004, ch. 15
- 2005, ch. 32
- 2008, ch. 6
- 2009, ch. 2
- 2010, ch. 3
- 2012, ch. 1
- 2013, ch. 8
- 2014, ch. 17
- 2015, ch. 20
- 2017, ch. 7
- 2018, ch. 12
- 2019, ch. 13
- 2019, ch. 16
- 2019, ch. 25
- 2020, ch. 1
- 2021, ch. 24
- 2021, ch. 27
- 2022, ch. 10
- 2022, ch. 17
- 2023, ch. 14
- 2023, ch. 32
- Fouilles, perquisitions et saisies
- Mandats de perquisition
- Interceptions
- 1993, c. 40