Ordonnances ADN
Ang |
Cette page a été mise à jour ou révisée de manière substantielle pour la dernière fois April 2021. (Rev. # 6799) |
n.b.: Cette page est expérimentale. Si vous repérez une grammaire ou un texte anglais clairement incorrect, veuillez m'en informer à [email protected] et je le corrigerai dès que possible. |
DNA Orders
DNA[1] Orders are court orders permitting certain law enforcement persons to take bodily substance samples for the purpose of adding a record of the offender's DNA to the national database.
Only "designated offences" are eligible for including DNA orders as part of sentencing. Section 487.04 defines "designated offence" as:
- Definitions
487.04 In this section and in sections 487.05 to 487.0911 ,
...
"designated offence" means a primary designated offence or a secondary designated offence; (infraction désignée)
...
1995, c. 27, s. 1; 1998, c. 37, s. 15; 2001, c. 41, s. 17; 2002, c. 1, s. 175; 2005, c. 25, s. 1, c. 43, ss. 5, 9; 2007, c. 22, ss. 2, 8, 47; 2008, c. 6, ss. 35, 63; 2009, c. 22, s. 16; 2010, c. 3, s. 6, c. 17, s. 3; 2012, c. 1, s. 30; 2013, c. 9, s. 16, c. 13, s. 8; 2014, c. 17, s. 13, c. 25, s. 23; 2015, c. 20, s. 23; 2018, c. 16, s. 216, c. 21, s. 18; 2019, c. 13, s. 152; 2019, c. 25, s. 196.1.
[annotation(s) ajoutée(s)]
A DNA order can be made by a sentencing judge where the offence being sentenced is either a "primary designated offence", for which it is mandatory, or a "secondary designated offence", for which it is discretionary.
Under Part XV of the Code, s. 487.04 to 487.092 concern the "Forensic DNA Analysis". Section 487.04 defines "forensic DNA analysis" as follows:
- Definitions
487.04 In this section and in sections 487.05 to 487.0911 ,
...
"forensic DNA analysis"
- (a) in relation to a bodily substance that is taken from a person in execution of a warrant under section 487.05 [mandat pour obtenir des échantillons d'ADN], means forensic DNA analysis of the bodily substance and the comparison of the results of that analysis with the results of the analysis of the DNA in the bodily substance referred to in paragraph 487.05(1)(b) [information pour mandat de prélèvement de substances corporelles pour analyse génétique médico-légale &ndash ; localisation de la substance corporelle], and includes any incidental tests associated with that analysis, and
- (b) in relation to a bodily substance that is provided voluntarily in the course of an investigation of a designated offence or is taken from a person under an order made under section 487.051 [Ordonnances de prélèvement d'ADN — infractions primaires désignées] or an authorization granted under section 487.055 [Ordonnances ADN — délinquants purgeant une peine] or 487.091 [collecte de substances corporelles supplémentaires], or to a bodily substance referred to in paragraph 487.05(1)(b) [information pour mandat de prélèvement de substances corporelles pour analyse génétique médico-légale &ndash ; localisation de la substance corporelle], means forensic DNA analysis of the bodily substance;
...
1995, c. 27, s. 1; 1998, c. 37, s. 15; 2001, c. 41, s. 17; 2002, c. 1, s. 175; 2005, c. 25, s. 1, c. 43, ss. 5, 9; 2007, c. 22, ss. 2, 8, 47; 2008, c. 6, ss. 35, 63; 2009, c. 22, s. 16; 2010, c. 3, s. 6, c. 17, s. 3; 2012, c. 1, s. 30; 2013, c. 9, s. 16, c. 13, s. 8; 2014, c. 17, s. 13, c. 25, s. 23; 2015, c. 20, s. 23; 2018, c. 16, s. 216, c. 21, s. 18; 2019, c. 13, s. 152; 2019, c. 25, s. 196.1.
[annotation(s) ajoutée(s)]
- Purpose
The purpose behind taking a DNA sample from offenders is not simply for law enforcement. Objectives include:[2]
- deter potential repeat offenders;
- promote the safety of the community;
- detect when a serial offender is at work;
- assist in solving cold crimes;
- streamline investigations; and most importantly,
- assist the innocent by early exclusion from investigative suspicion (or in exonerating those who have been wrongfully convicted).
- Format of Order
DNA orders for primary designated offences under s. 487.051(1) or (2) should be based on Form 5.03 of the Code. Those that are secondary designated offences under s. 487.051(3) should be Form 5.04.
- ↑ DNA is defined in s. 487.04 as "deoxyribonucleic acid"
- ↑
R c Jackpine/Rodgers, 2006 SCC 15 (CanLII), [2006] 1 SCR 554, par Charron J (4:3), au para 32
R c Briggs, 2001 CanLII 24113 (ON CA), 157 CCC (3d) 38, par Weiler JA, au para 22
Infractions désignées primaires
Infractions désignées primaires divisées en deux catégories. La première catégorie d’ODP sont les ordonnances ADN obligatoires en vertu de l’art. 487.051(1) lorsque l'infraction est énumérée à l'art. 487.04(a) ou (c.2). La deuxième catégorie d'AOP (parfois appelée AOP « présomptive ») permet une ordonnance d'ADN en vertu de l'art. 487.051(2) lorsque l'infraction est énumérée à l'art. 487.04(a.1) à (d), à l’exception de (c.2). Toutefois, le tribunal peut refuser de rendre une ordonnance d'ADN pour les infractions de la deuxième catégorie s'il « est convaincu que la personne a établi que l'impact d'une telle ordonnance sur sa vie privée et sa sécurité serait tout à fait disproportionné par rapport au public ». intérêt pour la protection de la société et la bonne administration de la justice, qui doivent être atteints grâce à la détection précoce, à l'arrestation et à la condamnation des délinquants".
- Ordonnance : infractions primaires
487.051 (1) En cas de déclaration de culpabilité sous le régime de la présente loi, de la Loi sur le système de justice pénale pour les adolescents ou de la Loi sur les jeunes contrevenants, ou d’absolution en vertu de l’article 730 [ordonnance de libération], à l’égard d’une infraction qui a été commise même avant le 30 juin 2000 et qui, à la date du prononcé de la peine ou de l’absolution, était une infraction primaire au sens des alinéas a) et c.02) de la définition de ce terme à l’article 487.04 [Analyse ADN – définitions], le tribunal doit rendre une ordonnance — rédigée selon la formule 5.03 [formes] — autorisant le prélèvement du nombre d’échantillons de substances corporelles de l’intéressé jugé nécessaire pour analyse génétique.
- Ordonnance : infractions primaires
(2) En cas de déclaration de culpabilité sous le régime de la présente loi, de la Loi sur le système de justice pénale pour les adolescents ou de la Loi sur les jeunes contrevenants, ou d’absolution en vertu de l’article 730 [ordonnance de libération], à l’égard d’une infraction qui a été commise même avant le 30 juin 2000 et qui, à la date du prononcé de la peine ou de l’absolution, était une infraction primaire au sens de l’un des alinéas a.1) à c.01) et c.03) à d) de la définition de ce terme à l’article 487.04 [Analyse ADN – définitions], le tribunal doit rendre une ordonnance — rédigée selon la formule 5.03 [formes] — au même effet. Toutefois, il n’est pas tenu de le faire s’il est convaincu que l’intéressé a établi que l’ordonnance aurait, sur sa vie privée et la sécurité de sa personne, un effet nettement démesuré par rapport à l’intérêt public en ce qui touche la protection de la société et la bonne administration de la justice, que visent à assurer la découverte, l’arrestation et la condamnation rapides des contrevenants.
[omis (3) and (4)]
1998, ch. 37, art. 17; 2002, ch. 1, art. 176; 2005, ch. 25, art. 3; 2007, ch. 22, art. 9 et 47; 2014, ch. 25, art. 24.
[annotation(s) ajoutée(s)]
- Forms
The mandatory PDOs and presumptive PDOs use Form 5.03.[1]
- ↑ see Criminal Code Forms
List of Primary Designated DNA Offences
- List of Primary Designated DNA Offences (including s. 487.04(a), (a.1), (b), (c), (c.01), (c.02), (c.03), and (d))
L'échantillon ne sera refusé que lorsque « l'impact de l'ordonnance sur la vie privée et la sécurité de la personne du délinquant [est] tout à fait disproportionné par rapport à l'intérêt public dans la protection de la société et la bonne administration de la justice qui doit être assurée grâce à la détection précoce, arrestation et condamnation des délinquants" [1]
Les facteurs à prendre en compte comprennent « la nature de l'infraction, la nature de l'intrusion et les circonstances de la personne qui fera l'objet de l'intrusion ».[2]
- ↑ R c Jordan, 2002 NSCA 11 (CanLII), 162 CCC (3d) 385, par Cromwell JA, au para 59
- ↑ , ibid., au para 61
Secondary Designated Offences
Distinct from "primary designated offences" are the "secondary designated offences" which is defined as:
s. 487.051
[omis (1) and (2)]
- Order — persons found not criminally responsible and secondary designated offences
(3) The court may, on application by the prosecutor and if it is satisfied that it is in the best interests of the administration of justice to do so, make such an order in Form 5.04 in relation to
- (a) a person who is found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder for an offence committed at any time, including before June 30, 2000, if that offence is a designated offence when the finding is made; or
- (b) a person who is convicted, discharged under section 730 [ordonnance de libération] or found guilty under the Youth Criminal Justice Act or the Young Offenders Act, of an offence committed at any time, including before June 30, 2000, if that offence is a secondary designated offence when the person is sentenced or discharged.
In deciding whether to make the order, the court shall consider the person’s criminal record, whether they were previously found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder for a designated offence, the nature of the offence, the circumstances surrounding its commission and the impact such an order would have on the person’s privacy and security of the person and shall give reasons for its decision.
[omis (4)]
1998, c. 37, s. 17; 2002, c. 1, s. 176; 2005, c. 25, s. 3; 2007, c. 22, ss. 9, 47; 2014, c. 25, s. 24.
[annotation(s) ajoutée(s)]
- Burden
When an offender is convicted of a secondary designated offence, the burden is upon the Crown to show that the order is in the "best interests of the administration of justice."[1]
- When to be Granted
Under s. 487.051(3)(b), DNA orders can only be granted for secondary offences where the prosecution applies and where the court is “satisfied that it is in the best interests of the administration of justice to do so, make [a DNA order] ... in relation to ...(b) a person who is convicted ... of an offence ... if that offence is a secondary designated offence when the person is sentenced or discharged.”
Due to the wording of the provision, the court has no authority to seek a DNA order for a SDO where the crown is not seeking one.[2]
- Forms
The SDOs use Form 5.04.[3]
- ↑ R c RC, 2005 SCC 61 (CanLII), [2005] 3 SCR 99, par Fish J
- ↑ similar provision was interpreted in such a fashion in R c BER, 2005 BCCA 420 (CanLII), 32 CR (6th) 151, par Ryan JA, aux paras 20 to 22
- ↑
see s. 487.051(3)
Criminal Code Forms
Secondary Designated Offences under 487.04(a), (a.1) or (b)
Secondary Designated Offences (SDO) that are classified under (a) or (b) of the definition under s. 487.04 designates Offences that are either straight indictment with maximum penalties of 5 years or more or hybrid offences, prosecuted by indictment, that have a maximum penalty of 5 years or more. Summary Offences or those with maximum penalties of less than 5 years are not SDOs.
Offences that are classified as "secondary designated offences" consist of:
487.04
...
"secondary designated offence" means an offence, other than a primary designated offence, that is
- (a) an offence under this Act that may be prosecuted by indictment — or, for section 487.051 [Ordonnances de prélèvement d'ADN — infractions primaires désignées] to apply, is prosecuted by indictment — for which the maximum punishment is imprisonment for five years or more,
- (a.1) an offence under any of the following provisions of the Cannabis Act that may be prosecuted by indictment — or, for section 487.051 [Ordonnances de prélèvement d'ADN — infractions primaires désignées] to apply, is prosecuted by indictment — for which the maximum punishment is imprisonment for five years or more:
- (i) section 9 (distribution and possession for purpose of distributing),
- (ii) section 10 (selling and possession for purpose of selling),
- (iii) section 11 (importing and exporting and possession for purpose of exporting),
- (iv) section 12 (production),
- (v) section 13 (possession, etc., for use in production or distribution of illicit cannabis), and
- (vi) section 14 (use of young person),
- (b) an offence under any of the following provisions of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act that may be prosecuted by indictment — or, for section 487.051 [Ordonnances de prélèvement d'ADN — infractions primaires désignées] to apply, is prosecuted by indictment — for which the maximum punishment is imprisonment for five years or more:
- (i) section 5 (trafficking in substance and possession for purpose of trafficking),
- (ii) section 6 (importing and exporting), and
- (iii) section 7 (production of substance),
- [omis (c), (d), (d.1), (d.2) and (e)]
...
1995, c. 27, s. 1; 1998, c. 37, s. 15; 2001, c. 41, s. 17; 2002, c. 1, s. 175; 2005, c. 25, s. 1, c. 43, ss. 5, 9; 2007, c. 22, ss. 2, 8, 47; 2008, c. 6, ss. 35, 63; 2009, c. 22, s. 16; 2010, c. 3, s. 6, c. 17, s. 3; 2012, c. 1, s. 30; 2013, c. 9, s. 16, c. 13, s. 8; 2014, c. 17, s. 13, c. 25, s. 23; 2015, c. 20, s. 23; 2018, c. 16, s. 216, c. 21, s. 18; 2019, c. 13, s. 152; 2019, c. 25, s. 196.1.
[annotation(s) ajoutée(s)]
Note that in the definition of "secondary designated offence" under (b) regarding CDSA trafficking-related convictions, this will only apply to drugs under Schedule I, II, and IV. Schedule IV offences, when prosecuted by indictment, have a maximum penalty of 3 years and so would not be subject to a secondary DNA Order.[1]
- ↑
See also Drug Trafficking (Offence)
487.04(a) Grouping
Secondary Designated Offences Under s. 487.04(c) to (e)
The SDOs listed under (c) to (e) of s. 487.04 apply irrespective of maximum penalty or Crown election.
- Group C
Group C consists of a long enumerated list:
- Group D to E
487.04 In this section and in sections 487.05 to 487.0911 ,
...
- (d) an offence under any of the following provisions of the Criminal Code, as they read from time to time before July 1, 1990:
- (i) section 433 (arson), and
- (ii) section 434 (setting fire to other substance),
- (d.1) an offence under section 252 [défaut d'arrêt sur les lieux d'un accident], as it read from time to time before the day on which section 14 of An Act to amend the Criminal Code (offences relating to conveyances) and to make consequential amendments to other Acts comes into force,
- (d.2) an offence under any of sections 249 [conduite dangereuse de véhicules à moteur, de navires et d'aéronefs], 249.1 [fuite d'un agent de la paix], 249.2 [causant la mort par négligence criminelle (course de rue)], 249.3 , 249.4 [conduite dangereuse d'un véhicule à moteur pendant une course de rue], 253 [conduite avec facultés affaiblies], 254 [prélèvement d'échantillons d'haleine/de sang] and 255 [conduite avec facultés affaiblies et procédure – punition], as they read from time to time before the day on which section 14 of An Act to amend the Criminal Code (offences relating to conveyances) and to make consequential amendments to other Acts comes into force, that may be prosecuted by indictment or, for section 487.051 to apply, is prosecuted by indictment, and
- (e) an attempt to commit or, other than for the purposes of subsection 487.05(1) [information pour mandat de prélèvement de substances corporelles pour analyse génétique médico-légale – motifs raisonnables], a conspiracy to commit
- (i) an offence referred to in paragraph (a) or (b) — which, for section 487.051 [Ordonnances de prélèvement d'ADN — infractions primaires désignées] to apply, is prosecuted by indictment, or
- (ii) an offence referred to in any of paragraphs (c) to (d.2); (infraction secondaire)
...
1995, c. 27, s. 1; 1998, c. 37, s. 15; 2001, c. 41, s. 17; 2002, c. 1, s. 175; 2005, c. 25, s. 1, c. 43, ss. 5, 9; 2007, c. 22, ss. 2, 8, 47; 2008, c. 6, ss. 35, 63; 2009, c. 22, s. 16; 2010, c. 3, s. 6, c. 17, s. 3; 2012, c. 1, s. 30; 2013, c. 9, s. 16, c. 13, s. 8; 2014, c. 17, s. 13, c. 25, s. 23; 2015, c. 20, s. 23; 2018, c. 16, s. 216, c. 21, s. 18; 2019, c. 25, s. 196.1.
[annotation(s) ajoutée(s)]
Factors When Imposing DNA Orders
The three enumerated factors to consider consist of:
- the criminal record of the offender
- the nature of the offence
- the impact on the privacy and security of the person
Courts have commented that in the "vast majority of cases it would be in the best interests of the administration of justice to make" a DNA Order.[1]
- ↑ R c PRF, 2001 CanLII 21168 (ON CA), 161 CCC (3d) 275, par Rosenberg JA
Criminal Record
The higher the rate of recidivism the greater the chance of making the DNA order.[1]
A lengthy record for violent offences may trump the low end nature of the offence.[2]
- ↑ R c North, 2002 ABCA 134 (CanLII), 165 CCC (3d) 393, par curiam, au para 50
- ↑
R c Garland, 2002 NSCA 112 (CanLII), 649 APR 399, par Cromwell JA, au para 4
Nature of the Offence
There are a number of considerations that are not considered relevant:
- The ineptitude of the offence[1]
- failure of the accused to disguise himself in the commission of the offence[2]
The difference between a commercial and residential break-in is not significant.[3]
- ↑ R c PRF, 2001 CanLII 21168 (ON CA), 161 CCC (3d) 275, par Rosenberg JA, au para 36
- ↑ R c SFA, 2002 NSCA 42 (CanLII), 635 APR 71, par Freeman JA
- ↑ PRF, supra
Impact on Privacy
The judge can decline to make a DNA order where it would be “would be grossly disproportionate to the public interest in the protection of society and the proper administration of justice."[1]
The accused must present "cogent evidence" establishing an impact on the accused's privacy interests.[2]
Taking of samples does not amount to a punishment.[3]
- ↑
R c Goodstriker, 2007 ABPC 334 (CanLII), par LeGrandeur J
R c Hafez, 2006 NSPC 13 (CanLII), 242 NSR (2d) 195, par Campbell J
R c RC, 2005 SCC 61 (CanLII), [2005] 3 SCR 99, par Fish J
- ↑ R c SFA, 2002 NSCA 42 (CanLII), 635 APR 71, par Freeman JA
- ↑
R c Rodgers, 2006 SCC 15 (CanLII), [2006] 1 SCR 554, par Charron J, au para 5
R c Murrins, 2002 NSCA 12 (CanLII), 162 CCC (3d) 412, par Bateman JA, au para 96
Taking of Samples
Offences Relating to DNA Orders
Appeals
- Appeal
487.054 The offender or the prosecutor may appeal from a decision of the court under any of subsections 487.051(1) to (3) .
1998, c. 37, s. 17; 2007, c. 22, s. 10.
[annotation(s) ajoutée(s)]
An appellant who is subject to a 487.056 Order may apply to have the order stayed pending appeal.[1]
A DNA order issued under s. 487.04 as a primary designed offence cannot be stayed pending appeal.[2]
- ↑ R c Gibson, 2011 BCSC 324 (CanLII), par Williamson J
- ↑ R c Kaplan, 2018 BCCA 31 (CanLII), par Fisher JA (chambers)
Procedure
- Prononcé de l’ordonnance
487.053 (1) Le tribunal peut rendre l’ordonnance visée à l’article 487.051 [Ordonnances de prélèvement d'ADN — infractions primaires désignées] autorisant le prélèvement d’échantillons de substances corporelles lors du prononcé de la peine, du verdict de non-responsabilité criminelle pour cause de troubles mentaux ou de l’absolution en vertu de l’article 730 [ordonnance de libération].
- Audience
(2) S’il ne décide pas de l’affaire à ce moment :
- a) il doit fixer la date de l’audience pour ce faire dans les quatre-vingt-dix jours suivant le prononcé de la peine, du verdict de non-responsabilité criminelle pour cause de troubles mentaux ou de l’absolution;
- b) il reste saisi de l’affaire;
- c) il peut ordonner à l’intéressé de comparaître à l’audience par télévision en circuit fermé ou par vidéoconférence, pourvu que l’intéressé ait la possibilité, s’il est représenté par un avocat, de communiquer en privé avec celui-ci.
1998, ch. 37, art. 17; 2000, ch. 10, art. 14; 2005, ch. 25, art. 4; 2007, ch. 22, art. 3; 2019, ch. 25, art. 198.
[annotation(s) ajoutée(s)]
- Form Required
487.051
[omis (1), (2) and (3)]
- Order to offender
(4) When the court makes an order authorizing the taking of samples of bodily substances, it may make an order in Form 5.041 [formes] to require the person to report at the place, day and time set out in the order and submit to the taking of the samples.
1998, c. 37, s. 17; 2002, c. 1, s. 176; 2005, c. 25, s. 3; 2007, c. 22, ss. 9, 47; 2014, c. 25, s. 24.
[annotation(s) ajoutée(s)]