« Analyse des témoignages » : différence entre les versions

see [[Admission des faits]]

{{CanLIIRP|Baldree|fqcws|2012 ONCA 138 (CanLII)|280 CCC (3d) 191}}{{perONCA|Feldman JA}} (2:1){{AtL|fqcws|43}} - a fait appel pour d'autres motifs à [http://canlii.ca/t/fz7b7 2013 CSC 35] (CanLII)</ref>

{{CanLIIR|Gerrard|jntwg|2022 CSC 13 (CanLII}}{{perSCC-H|Moldaver J}} ( {{Tr}}« Il importe peu que la juge de première instance ait évalué la crédibilité de la plaignante avant celle de l’accusé; cela ne démontre pas automatiquement qu’elle a inversé le fardeau de la preuve » )<br>

R. v. Carrière, 2001 CanLII 8609 (ON CA), [2001] O.J. No. 4157 (C.A. Ont.), at paras. 48-51 per Doherty J.A.<br>

R. v. S. (M.), 2008 ONCA 616, [2008] O.J. No. 3465 (C.A. Ont.), at para. 53 per Cronk J.A

{{CanLIIRP|Mathieu|1p9s4|1994 CanLII 5561 (QC CA)|90 CCC (3d) 415}}{{perQCCA|Brossard JA et Fish JA}}{{atL|1p9s4|61}} aff’d [http://canlii.ca/t/1frfr 1995 CanLII 79] (CSC), [1995] 4 RCS 46{{{perSCC|Lamer CJ}}, ( {{Tr}}« ...triers of fact remain free, as they have always been in the past, to accept all, part or none of the evidence of any witness... . The evidence of each witness must be considered in the light of all the other evidence.» )<bR>

{{CanLIIRP|Slatter|j2r66|2019 ONCA 807 (CanLII)|382 CCC (3d) 245}}{{perONCA|Pepall JA}}{{atsL|j2r66|117| à 118}} ( {{Tr}}« ...credibility and reliability are different concepts. Credibility deals with a witness's veracity or truthfulness, while reliability addresses the accuracy of a witness's testimony. Accuracy engages consideration of a witness's ability to accurately observe, recall, and recount...» )<br>

{{supra1|O'Connor}}{{atL|1cgld|23}} ( {{Tr}}« ...when it is an accused's testimony which is disbelieved, the circumstance in which the accused gave the disbelieved version of events -- as part of the trial process itself -- is not considered to be independent evidence of fabrication permitting an adverse inference against the accused:... Before an adverse inference may be drawn, there must be evidence capable of showing fabrication apart from both the evidence contradicting the accused's testimony and the fact that the accused is found to have testified falsely at the trial.» )<br>

{{CanLIIR-N|RWB| (1993), 24 BCAC 1, 40 WAC 1 (BCCA)}} aux pp. 9-10 {{perONCA|Rowles JA}} (" While it is true that minor inconsistencies may not diminish the credibility of a witness unduly, a series of inconsistencies may become quite significant and cause the trier of fact to have a reasonable doubt about the reliability of the witness's evidence. » )

{{CanLIIRP|Krack|gd3xl|1990 CanLII 10976 (ON CA)|56 CCC (3d) 555}}{{perONCA|Lacouriciere JA}} (3:0){{atps|561-562}} (CCC)<br>

{{supra1|TM}} ( {{Tr}}« ...questions that explored the nature of the relationship between the appellant and the complainants, or between the complainants themselves, were proper.» )<br>

{{CanLIIRP|Ramos|jbtj6|2020 MBCA 111 (CanLII)|MJ No 266}}{{AtL|jbtj6|113}} ( {{Tr}}« ...in assessing credibility, caution should be exercised in reliance on demeanour evidence; undue weight should not be placed on it.» )<br>