« Voies de fait (infraction) » : différence entre les versions

(29 versions intermédiaires par le même utilisateur non affichées)

Ligne 1 :

[[en:Common_Assault_(Offence)]]

{{OffenceBox

|OffenceTitle=Voies de fait

Ligne 94 :

Ligne 93 :

:b) soit d’une infraction punissable sur déclaration de culpabilité par procédure sommaire.

S.R., ch. C-34, art. ~~2451972~~, ch. 13, art. 211974-75-76, ch. 93, art. 221980-81-82-83, ch. 125, art. 19

S.R., ch. C-34, art. 245;

1972, ch. 13, art. 211974-75-76, ch. 93, art. 221980-81-82-83, ch. 125, art. 19

|{{CCCSec2|266}}

|{{NoteUp|266}}

Ligne 113 :

# {{box}} the culprit applied force on the victim

Ligne 120 :

# {{box}} injuries, if any, that occurred

# {{box}} compare physical build between the accused and victim

# {{box}} that the complainant did not consent (~~see also~~ s. 265(3) ~~and~~ (4))

# {{box}} that the complainant did not consent (voir également s. 265(3) et (4))

# {{box}} that the complainant did not assault, threaten or provoke the accused

# {{box}} whether an alcohol was involved

Ligne 126 :

# {{box}} the culprit attempted or threatened to apply force to the victim

Ligne 133 :

# {{box}} no intentional physical contact was made

# {{box}} compare physical build between the accused and victim

# {{box}} that the complainant did not consent (~~see also~~ s. 265(3) ~~and~~ (4))

# {{box}} that the complainant did not consent (voir également s. 265(3) et (4))

# {{box}} that the complainant did not assault, threaten or provoke the accused

# {{box}} whether an alcohol was involved

Ligne 139 :

# {{box}} the culprit was "openly wearing or carrying a weapon or imitation thereof"

# {{box}} the culprit accosted or impeded the victim or begged

# {{box}} compare physical build between the accused and victim

# {{box}} that the complainant did not consent (~~see also~~ s. 265(3) ~~and~~ (4))

# {{box}} that the complainant did not consent (voir également s. 265(3) et (4))

# {{box}} that the complainant did not assault, threaten or provoke the accused

# {{box}} whether an alcohol was involved

Ligne 177 :

</ref>

~~This broad definition does present a risk of "absurd consequences"~~, ~~but it should be left to the courts to draw the line~~.<ref>

Cette définition large présente un risque de « conséquences absurdes », mais il devrait être laissé aux tribunaux le soin de tracer la ligne.<ref>

see {{CanLIIRP|Jobidon|~~1fskj~~|1991 CanLII 77 (~~SCC~~)|[1991] 2 ~~SCR~~ 714}}{{perSCC|Gonthier J}}

see {{CanLIIRP|Jobidon|1fskk|1991 CanLII 77 (CSC)|[1991] 2 RCS 714}}{{perSCC|Gonthier J}}

</ref>

~~The~~ doctrine of [[~~Consent~~#~~Implied Consent~~|~~implied consent~~]] ~~will exclude some of the trivial assaults from being criminally liable~~.<ref>

La doctrine du [[Consentement#Consentement implicite|consentement implicite]] exclura certaines agressions insignifiantes de toute responsabilité pénale.<ref>e.g. see discussion in {{CanLIIRx|Bennett|1p8m1|2006 CanLII 31012 (NL PC)}}{{perNLPC|Gorman J}}{{atsL|1p8m1|41| to 44}}

e.g. see discussion in {{CanLIIRx|Bennett|1p8m1|2006 CanLII 31012 (NL PC)}}{{perNLPC|Gorman J}}{{atsL|1p8m1|41| to 44}}

</ref>

Ligne 188 :

Ligne 187 :

===Intention===

~~The Crown must prove the accused had~~ intention ~~to apply~~ force. <ref>

La Couronne doit prouver que l'accusé avait l'intention de recourir à la force. <ref>

{{CanLIIRP|Ewanchuk|~~1fqpm~~|1999 CanLII 711 (~~SCC~~)|[1999] 1 ~~SCR~~ 330}}{{perSCC-H|Major J}}

{{CanLIIRP|Ewanchuk|1fqpl|1999 CanLII 711 (CSC)|[1999] 1 RCS 330}}{{perSCC-H|Major J}}

{{CanLIIRP|Bartlett|g8x9s|1989 CanLII 4889 (NLSCTD)| Nfld. & PEIR 143 (NLSC)}}{{perNLSC|Cameron J}}

</ref>

~~The use of the word “intentionally” refers to the application of~~ force ~~or “to the manner in which~~ force ~~is applied”~~<ref>

L’utilisation du mot « intentionnellement » fait référence à l’application de la force ou « à la manière dont la force est appliquée »<ref>

{{CanLIIRP|George|21vcd|1960 CanLII 45 (~~SCC~~)|[1960] ~~SCR~~ 871}}{{perSCC-H|Fauteux J}}</ref>

{{CanLIIRP|George|21vcd|1960 CanLII 45 (CSC)|[1960] RCS 871}}{{perSCC-H|Fauteux J}}</ref>

~~An element of "hostility" has never been essential in the proof of assault~~. ~~It would otherwise exclude liability due to pranks getting out of hand,~~ non~~-consensual surgical treatment~~.<ref>

L'élément d'« hostilité » n'a jamais été essentiel dans la preuve d'une agression. Il exclurait sinon la responsabilité en cas de farces qui auraient pu déraper ou de traitement chirurgical non consenti.<ref>

{{UKCase|F v West Berkshire Health Authority|, [1989] 2 All ER 545 (H.L.)}}, at page 564

</ref>

~~Force~~ due ~~to carelessness or reflex is not sufficient~~.<ref>

La force due à l'imprudence ou au réflexe n'est pas suffisante.<ref>

{{CanLIIRP|Starratt|g19d0|1971 CanLII 541 (ON CA)|5 CCC (2d) 32 (CA)}}{{perONCA|Gale CJ}}

{{CanLIIRP|Wolfe|htwp8|1974 CanLII 1643|20 CCC (2d) 382}}{{perONCA| Gale CJ}}

Ligne 206 :

Ligne 205 :

===~~Attempts or Threatens~~===

===Tentatives ou menaces===

~~An uttered threat accompanied by a preparatory~~ action ~~will amount to an assault~~.<ref>

Une menace proférée accompagnée d'une action préparatoire constituera une agression.<ref>

e.g. {{CanLIIRx|Brogan|fwdxh|2013 MBQB 6 (CanLII)}}{{perMBQB|Greenberg J}} - ~~offender committed assault when he "stood up~~, ~~clenched his fists and said “Let’s go”"~~

p. ex. {{CanLIIRx|Brogan|fwdxh|2013 MBQB 6 (CanLII)}}{{perMBQB|Greenberg J}} - le délinquant a commis une agression lorsqu'il « s'est levé, a serré les poings et a dit « Allons-y » »

</ref>

=== ~~Consent~~ ===

=== Consentement ===

~~See~~ [[~~Consent~~]]

Voir [[Consentement au contact physique]]

==~~Traditional Defences~~==

==Défenses traditionnelles==

* [[~~Defences~~|Consensual fight]]

* [[Moyens de défenses|Consensual fight]]

* [[~~Self-Defence and Defence of Another~~|Self-Defence]]

* [[Autodéfense et défense d'autrui|Self-Defence]]

* [[~~Self-Defence and Defence of Another~~|Defence of Another]]

* [[Autodéfense et défense d'autrui|Defence of Another]]

* [[~~Defences~~|~~Defence of Property~~]]

* [[Moyens de défenses|Défense de la propriété]]

* [[~~Defences~~|De Minimus]]

* [[Moyens de défenses|De Minimus]]

* [[~~Defences~~|Reflex]]

* [[Moyens de défenses|Reflex]]

* [[Corrective Force|Corrective Force]]

Ligne 267 :

Ligne 266 :

; Dispositions disponibles

|art. 266 {{DescrSec|266}} || ~~any~~ || {{SProfileAll}}

|art. 266 {{DescrSec|266}} || quelconque || {{SProfileAll}}

|-

Ligne 283 :

Ligne 282 :

{{CanLIIR|Evans|6j9k|1996 CanLII 19983 (AB PC)|182 AR 21}}

{{CanLIIR|Laberge|2dc8j|1995 ABCA 196 (CanLII)|165 A.R. 375; 89 W.A.C. 375; 27 W.C.B.(2d) 176}}{{perABCA|Fraser ACJ}}

{{CanLIIR|Hilterman|gqckt|1993 CanLII 16387 (AB CA)|141 A.R. 223; 46 W.A.C. 223}}{{perABCA|Belzil JA ~~and~~ Prowse J}}

{{CanLIIR|Hilterman|gqckt|1993 CanLII 16387 (AB CA)|141 A.R. 223; 46 W.A.C. 223}}{{perABCA|Belzil JA et Prowse J}}

</ref>

# The application of force with, if not the intention, the expectation of causing injury or, an indifference as to whether injuries will result;

Ligne 304 :

Ligne 303 :

Given police's important role in society, they are expected to adhere to "exemplary behaviour" in both their professional and private lives.<Ref>

{{CanLIIR|DED|1wkz8|2007 ABQB 508 (CanLII)}}{{perABQB| J}}{{atL|1wkz8|81}}

R v Wallator, [1994] A.J. No. 194 (Prov. Ct.) at para 18 ("Police officers have an important peace role to play in society. They are under constant public scrutiny with a public demand for exemplary behaviour. There is a public attitude that police officers are expected to live, and to reflect higher standards of attitude and conduct, not only in their professional lives but also in their private lives, which is much more than is required of private citizens. Police forces reinforce these views through internal discipline procedures and regular personal evaluation reports (which are reviewed by supervisors).")

R v Wallator, [1994] A.J. No. 194 (Prov. Ct.) at para 18 ( {{Tr}}« Police officers have an important peace role to play in society. They are under constant public scrutiny with a public demand for exemplary behaviour. There is a public attitude that police officers are expected to live, and to reflect higher standards of attitude and conduct, not only in their professional lives but also in their private lives, which is much more than is required of private citizens. Police forces reinforce these views through internal discipline procedures and regular personal evaluation reports (which are reviewed by supervisors). » )

</ref>

Ligne 329 :

Ligne 328 :

; Ordonnances spécifiques à une infraction

| [[~~Ordres~~ ADN]] ||art. 266 {{DescrSec|266}} ||

| [[Ordonnances ADN]] ||art. 266 {{DescrSec|266}} ||

** {{SecondDNA(CtoE)|art. 266}}

|-

| [[Ordonnances ~~d’interdiction des~~ armes]] || s. 266 {{DescrSec|266}} ||

| [[Ordonnances d'interdiction d'armes]] || s. 266 {{DescrSec|266}} ||

** {{Section110|art. 266}}

|-

| [[~~Delayed_Parole_Eligibility~~|~~Delayed Parole Order~~]] ||art. 266 {{DescrSec|266}}||

| [[Admissibilité à la libération conditionnelle différée|Ordonnance de libération conditionnelle différée]] ||art. 266 {{DescrSec|266}}||

* {{ParoleDelayEligible|1|art. 266}}

Ligne 349 :

Ligne 348 :

==History of Common Assault==

* [[History of ~~Common Assault~~ (~~Offence~~)]]

* [[History of Voies de fait (infraction)]]

==Voir également==

; Related Offences

* [[~~Assault with a Weapon or Causing Bodily Harm~~ (~~Offence~~)]]

* [[Agression armée ou infliction de lésions corporelles (infraction)]]

* [[~~Aggravated Assault~~ (~~Offence~~)]]

* [[Voies de fait graves (infraction)]]

* [[~~Assault Peace Officer~~ (~~Offence~~)]]

* [[Voies de fait contre un agent de la paix (infraction)]]

; Trial-related Matters

* [[Assault-based Offences (Model Examinations)]]

@@ Ligne 1 : / Ligne 1 : @@
 [[en:Common_Assault_(Offence)]]
-{{Currency2|January|2016}}
+{{Currency2|janvier|2016}}
 {{LevelZero}}{{HeaderOffences}}
 {{OffenceBox
 |OffenceTitle=Voies de fait
@@ Ligne 94 : / Ligne 93 : @@
 :b) soit d’une infraction punissable sur déclaration de culpabilité par procédure sommaire.
-S.R., ch. C-34, art. 2451972, ch. 13, art. 211974-75-76, ch. 93, art. 221980-81-82-83, ch. 125, art. 19
+S.R., ch. C-34, art. 245;
+, ch. 13, art. 211974-75-76, ch. 93, art. 221980-81-82-83, ch. 125, art. 19
 |{{CCCSec2|266}}
 |{{NoteUp|266}}
@@ Ligne 113 : / Ligne 113 : @@
 {{ElementLeft}}
-{{Proving|assault by force|265(1)(a)}}
+{{Proving|assault by force|265(1) a)}}
 {{InitialElements}}
 # {{box}} the culprit applied force on the victim
@@ Ligne 120 : / Ligne 120 : @@
 # {{box}} injuries, if any, that occurred
 # {{box}} compare physical build between the accused and victim
-# {{box}} that the complainant did not consent (see also s. 265(3) and (4))
+# {{box}} that the complainant did not consent (voir également s. 265(3) et (4))
 # {{box}} that the complainant did not assault, threaten or provoke the accused
 # {{box}} whether an alcohol was involved
@@ Ligne 126 : / Ligne 126 : @@
 {{ElementRight}}
-{{Proving|assault by threat|265(1)(b)}}
+{{Proving|assault by threat|265(1) b)}}
 {{InitialElements}}
 # {{box}} the culprit attempted or threatened to apply force to the victim
@@ Ligne 133 : / Ligne 133 : @@
 # {{box}} no intentional physical contact was made
 # {{box}} compare physical build between the accused and victim
-# {{box}} that the complainant did not consent (see also s. 265(3) and (4))
+# {{box}} that the complainant did not consent (voir également s. 265(3) et (4))
 # {{box}} that the complainant did not assault, threaten or provoke the accused
 # {{box}} whether an alcohol was involved
@@ Ligne 139 : / Ligne 139 : @@
 {{ElementLeft}}
-{{Proving|assault, carrying weapon|265(1)(c)}}
+{{Proving|assault, carrying weapon|265(1) c)}}
 {{InitialElements}}
 # {{box}} the culprit was "openly wearing or carrying a weapon or imitation thereof"
 # {{box}} the culprit accosted or impeded the victim or begged
 # {{box}} compare physical build between the accused and victim
-# {{box}} that the complainant did not consent (see also s. 265(3) and (4))
+# {{box}} that the complainant did not consent (voir également s. 265(3) et (4))
 # {{box}} that the complainant did not assault, threaten or provoke the accused
 # {{box}} whether an alcohol was involved
@@ Ligne 177 : / Ligne 177 : @@
 </ref>
-This broad definition does present a risk of "absurd consequences", but it should be left to the courts to draw the line.<ref>
+Cette définition large présente un risque de « conséquences absurdes », mais il devrait être laissé aux tribunaux le soin de tracer la ligne.<ref>
-see {{CanLIIRP|Jobidon|1fskj|1991 CanLII 77 (SCC)|[1991] 2 SCR 714}}{{perSCC|Gonthier J}}
+see {{CanLIIRP|Jobidon|1fskk|1991 CanLII 77 (CSC)|[1991] 2 RCS 714}}{{perSCC|Gonthier J}}
 </ref>
-The doctrine of [[Consent#Implied Consent|implied consent]] will exclude some of the trivial assaults from being criminally liable.<ref>
+La doctrine du [[Consentement#Consentement implicite|consentement implicite]] exclura certaines agressions insignifiantes de toute responsabilité pénale.<ref>e.g. see discussion in {{CanLIIRx|Bennett|1p8m1|2006 CanLII 31012 (NL PC)}}{{perNLPC|Gorman J}}{{atsL|1p8m1|41| to 44}}<br>
-e.g. see discussion in {{CanLIIRx|Bennett|1p8m1|2006 CanLII 31012 (NL PC)}}{{perNLPC|Gorman J}}{{atsL|1p8m1|41| to 44}}<br>
 </ref>
@@ Ligne 188 : / Ligne 187 : @@
 ===Intention===
-The Crown must prove the accused had intention to apply force. <ref>
+La Couronne doit prouver que l'accusé avait l'intention de recourir à la force. <ref>
-{{CanLIIRP|Ewanchuk|1fqpm|1999 CanLII 711 (SCC)|[1999] 1 SCR 330}}{{perSCC-H|Major J}}<br>
+{{CanLIIRP|Ewanchuk|1fqpl|1999 CanLII 711 (CSC)|[1999] 1 RCS 330}}{{perSCC-H|Major J}}<br>
 {{CanLIIRP|Bartlett|g8x9s|1989 CanLII 4889 (NLSCTD)| Nfld. & PEIR 143 (NLSC)}}{{perNLSC|Cameron J}}
 </ref>
-The use of the word “intentionally” refers to the application of force or “to the manner in which force is applied”<ref>
+L’utilisation du mot « intentionnellement » fait référence à l’application de la force ou « à la manière dont la force est appliquée »<ref>
-{{CanLIIRP|George|21vcd|1960 CanLII 45 (SCC)|[1960] SCR 871}}{{perSCC-H|Fauteux J}}</ref>
+{{CanLIIRP|George|21vcd|1960 CanLII 45 (CSC)|[1960] RCS 871}}{{perSCC-H|Fauteux J}}</ref>
-An element of "hostility" has never been essential in the proof of assault. It would otherwise exclude liability due to pranks getting out of hand, non-consensual surgical treatment.<ref>
+L'élément d'« hostilité » n'a jamais été essentiel dans la preuve d'une agression. Il exclurait sinon la responsabilité en cas de farces qui auraient pu déraper ou de traitement chirurgical non consenti.<ref>
 {{UKCase|F v West Berkshire Health Authority|, [1989] 2 All ER 545 (H.L.)}}, at page 564<br>
 </ref>
-Force due to carelessness or reflex is not sufficient.<ref>
+La force due à l'imprudence ou au réflexe n'est pas suffisante.<ref>
 {{CanLIIRP|Starratt|g19d0|1971 CanLII 541 (ON CA)|5 CCC (2d) 32 (CA)}}{{perONCA|Gale CJ}}<br>
 {{CanLIIRP|Wolfe|htwp8|1974 CanLII 1643|20 CCC (2d) 382}}{{perONCA| Gale CJ}}<br>
@@ Ligne 206 : / Ligne 205 : @@
 {{reflist|2}}
-===Attempts or Threatens===
+===Tentatives ou menaces===
-An uttered threat accompanied by a preparatory action will amount to an assault.<ref>
+Une menace proférée accompagnée d'une action préparatoire constituera une agression.<ref>
-e.g. {{CanLIIRx|Brogan|fwdxh|2013 MBQB 6 (CanLII)}}{{perMBQB|Greenberg J}} - offender committed assault when he "stood up, clenched his fists and said “Let’s go”"
+p. ex. {{CanLIIRx|Brogan|fwdxh|2013 MBQB 6 (CanLII)}}{{perMBQB|Greenberg J}} - le délinquant a commis une agression lorsqu'il « s'est levé, a serré les poings et a dit « Allons-y » »
 </ref>
 {{reflist|2}}
-=== Consent ===
+=== Consentement ===
-See [[Consent]]
+Voir [[Consentement au contact physique]]
-==Traditional Defences==
+==Défenses traditionnelles==
-* [[Defences|Consensual fight]]
+* [[Moyens de défenses|Consensual fight]]
-* [[Self-Defence and Defence of Another|Self-Defence]]
+* [[Autodéfense et défense d'autrui|Self-Defence]]
-* [[Self-Defence and Defence of Another|Defence of Another]]
+* [[Autodéfense et défense d'autrui|Defence of Another]]
-* [[Defences|Defence of Property]]
+* [[Moyens de défenses|Défense de la propriété]]
-* [[Defences|De Minimus]]
+* [[Moyens de défenses|De Minimus]]
-* [[Defences|Reflex]]
+* [[Moyens de défenses|Reflex]]
 * [[Corrective Force|Corrective Force]]
@@ Ligne 267 : / Ligne 266 : @@
 ; Dispositions disponibles
 {{SProfileAvailHeader}}
-|art. 266 {{DescrSec|266}} || any || {{SProfileAll}}
+|art. 266 {{DescrSec|266}} || quelconque || {{SProfileAll}}
 |-
 {{SProfileEnd}}
@@ Ligne 283 : / Ligne 282 : @@
 {{CanLIIR|Evans|6j9k|1996 CanLII 19983 (AB PC)|182 AR 21}}<br>
 {{CanLIIR|Laberge|2dc8j|1995 ABCA 196 (CanLII)|165 A.R. 375; 89 W.A.C. 375; 27 W.C.B.(2d) 176}}{{perABCA|Fraser ACJ}}<br>
-{{CanLIIR|Hilterman|gqckt|1993 CanLII 16387 (AB CA)|141 A.R. 223; 46 W.A.C. 223}}{{perABCA|Belzil JA and Prowse J}}<bR>
+{{CanLIIR|Hilterman|gqckt|1993 CanLII 16387 (AB CA)|141 A.R. 223; 46 W.A.C. 223}}{{perABCA|Belzil JA et Prowse J}}<bR>
 </ref>
 # The application of force with, if not the intention, the expectation of causing injury or, an indifference as to whether injuries will result;
@@ Ligne 304 : / Ligne 303 : @@
 Given police's important role in society, they are expected to adhere to "exemplary behaviour" in both their professional and private lives.<Ref>
 {{CanLIIR|DED|1wkz8|2007 ABQB 508 (CanLII)}}{{perABQB| J}}{{atL|1wkz8|81}}<Br>
-R v Wallator, [1994] A.J. No. 194 (Prov. Ct.) at para 18 ("Police officers have an important peace role to play in society. They are under constant public scrutiny with a public demand for exemplary behaviour. There is a public attitude that police officers are expected to live, and to reflect higher standards of attitude and conduct, not only in their professional lives but also in their private lives, which is much more than is required of private citizens. Police forces reinforce these views through internal discipline procedures and regular personal evaluation reports (which are reviewed by supervisors).")
+R v Wallator, [1994] A.J. No. 194 (Prov. Ct.) at para 18 ( {{Tr}}« Police officers have an important peace role to play in society. They are under constant public scrutiny with a public demand for exemplary behaviour. There is a public attitude that police officers are expected to live, and to reflect higher standards of attitude and conduct, not only in their professional lives but also in their private lives, which is much more than is required of private citizens. Police forces reinforce these views through internal discipline procedures and regular personal evaluation reports (which are reviewed by supervisors). » )
 </ref>
@@ Ligne 329 : / Ligne 328 : @@
 ; Ordonnances spécifiques à une infraction
 {{AOrderHeader}}
-| [[Ordres ADN]]  ||art. 266 {{DescrSec|266}} ||
+| [[Ordonnances ADN]]  ||art. 266 {{DescrSec|266}} ||
 ** {{SecondDNA(CtoE)|art. 266}}
 |-
-| [[Ordonnances d’interdiction des armes]]   || s. 266 {{DescrSec|266}} ||
+| [[Ordonnances d'interdiction d'armes]]   || s. 266 {{DescrSec|266}} ||
 ** {{Section110|art. 266}}
 |-
-| [[Delayed_Parole_Eligibility|Delayed Parole Order]] ||art. 266 {{DescrSec|266}}||
+| [[Admissibilité à la libération conditionnelle différée|Ordonnance de libération conditionnelle différée]] ||art. 266 {{DescrSec|266}}||
 * {{ParoleDelayEligible|1|art. 266}}
 {{AOrderEnd}}
@@ Ligne 349 : / Ligne 348 : @@
 ==History of Common Assault==
-* [[History of Common Assault (Offence)]]
+* [[History of Voies de fait (infraction)]]
 ==Voir également==
 ; Related Offences
-* [[Assault with a Weapon or Causing Bodily Harm (Offence)]]
+* [[Agression armée ou infliction de lésions corporelles (infraction)]]
-* [[Aggravated Assault (Offence)]]
+* [[Voies de fait graves (infraction)]]
-* [[Assault Peace Officer (Offence)]]
+* [[Voies de fait contre un agent de la paix (infraction)]]
 ; Trial-related Matters
 * [[Assault-based Offences (Model Examinations)]]

« Voies de fait (infraction) » : différence entre les versions

« Voies de fait (infraction) » : différence entre les versions